Yabut v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3) ROBBYJOE V. YABUT, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01014-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 13] LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 7 Defendant 8 9 On April 14, 2025, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Robbyjoe Yabut did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF 13. Yabut did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo 13} determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 13) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 20 DATED this 30th day of April, 2025. 21 Z. 22 ooo ANDREW P. GORDON 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE