Yablon v. Yablon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Yablon v. Yablon

511 So. 2d 400, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1846, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9589

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 29, 1987·No. No. 82-1213·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm except that appellant, former wife, is entitled to an award for fees for the services of attorney Chaykin, both under the authority of Lewis v. Lewis, 383 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), (because of the extensive and unnecessary expenditure of attorney’s time caused by the behavior of appellee) and under Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), (because of the disparate financial circumstances of the parties). We remand for a hearing to determine a reasonable attorney’s fee to be awarded for the benefit of appellant against appellee.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm except that appellant, former wife, is entitled to an award for fees for the services of attorney Chaykin, both under the authority of Lewis v. Lewis, 383 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), (because of the extensive and unnecessary expenditure of attorney’s time caused by the behavior of appellee) and under Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), (because of the disparate financial circumstances of the parties). We remand for a hearing to determine a reasonable attorney’s fee to be awarded for the benefit of appellant against appellee.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Yablon v. Yablon, 511 So. 2d 400, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1846, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 9589 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

511 So. 2d 400 (Yablon v. Yablon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related