Yablon v. Coburn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Yablon v. Coburn

219 A.D.2d 560, 631 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9619

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 1995·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about April 19,1995, which directed that plaintiff disclose the medical school, residency and fellowships attended by her medical expert and the States in which such witness is licensed to practice medicine, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[561]*561The demands in dispute are proper inquiries bearing upon the qualifications of the expert, the need for which outweighs the unlikelihood that the information would allow identification of the expert’s name (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]; see, Jasopersaud v Rho, 169 AD2d 184). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about April 19,1995, which directed that plaintiff disclose the medical school, residency and fellowships attended by her medical expert and the States in which such witness is licensed to practice medicine, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[561]*561The demands in dispute are proper inquiries bearing upon the qualifications of the expert, the need for which outweighs the unlikelihood that the information would allow identification of the expert’s name (CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [i]; see, Jasopersaud v Rho, 169 AD2d 184). Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.

Yablon v. Coburn, 219 A.D.2d 560, 631 N.Y.S.2d 351, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

219 A.D.2d 560 (Yablon v. Coburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related