Xue Ling Wang v. Ashcroft
This text of 73 F. App'x 279 (Xue Ling Wang v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Wang did not file a petition for review of the underlying removal order. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review it. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b).
The Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion, Shaar v. INS, 141 F.3d 953, 955 (9th Cir.1998), by denying Wang’s untimely filed motion to reopen. New evidence of an already existing circumstance does not constitute a “changed circumstance[ ] arising in the country of [280]*280nationality or in the country to which deportation has been ordered.” 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(e)(3)(ii).
DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F. App'x 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xue-ling-wang-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.