Xue-Fang Hu v. Florida Department of Health

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Xue-Fang Hu v. Florida Department of Health

120 So. 3d 1255, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14153, 2013 WL 4746572

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 4, 2013

DocketNo. 3D12-3138

StatusPublished

This text of 120 So. 3d 1255 (Xue-Fang Hu v. Florida Department of Health) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Xue-Fang Hu v. Florida Department of Health, 120 So. 3d 1255, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14153, 2013 WL 4746572 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

ROTHENBERG, J.

Xue-Fang Hu (“the appellant”), a licensed massage therapist and the owner and director of Jing Lou Massage, Inc. (“Jing Lou Massage”), appeals the final order issued by the Board of Massage Therapy (“the Board”) revoking the appellant’s massage therapist license and imposing costs. The Department of Health proved by clear and convincing evidence that the appellant violated sections 480.46(l)(o) and 480.0465 of the Florida Statutes (2011), and Rule 64B7-33.001, subsections (1), (2), and (3) of the Florida Administrative Code. We also conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion in revoking the appellant’s license based on the aggravating factors also proven by the Department of Health. Accordingly, we affirm the final order issued by the Board.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROTHENBERG, J.

Xue-Fang Hu (“the appellant”), a licensed massage therapist and the owner and director of Jing Lou Massage, Inc. (“Jing Lou Massage”), appeals the final order issued by the Board of Massage Therapy (“the Board”) revoking the appellant’s massage therapist license and imposing costs. The Department of Health proved by clear and convincing evidence that the appellant violated sections 480.46(l)(o) and 480.0465 of the Florida Statutes (2011), and Rule 64B7-33.001, subsections (1), (2), and (3) of the Florida Administrative Code. We also conclude the Board did not abuse its discretion in revoking the appellant’s license based on the aggravating factors also proven by the Department of Health. Accordingly, we affirm the final order issued by the Board.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 So. 3d 1255, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14153, 2013 WL 4746572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xue-fang-hu-v-florida-department-of-health-fladistctapp-2013.