Xiu Jian Sun v. Yeung

132 A.D.3d 756, 17 N.Y.S.3d 660
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 2015·No. 2014-08945·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the plaintiff, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pineda-Kirwan, J.), dated July 22, 2014, as granted that branch of the defendants’ unopposed motion which was to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511).

The plaintiff is not aggrieved by the portion of the order appealed from, as he did not submit opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint (see CPLR 5511; Janiak v Ewall, 88 AD3d 849, 850 [2011]; Ponce-Francisco v Plainview-Old Bethpage Cent. School Dist., 83 AD3d 683, 684 [2011]). Thus, the appeal must be dismissed.

Mastro, J.P., Leventhal, Duffy and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Xiu Jian Sun v. Yeung, 132 A.D.3d 756, 17 N.Y.S.3d 660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

132 A.D.3d 756 (Xiu Jian Sun v. Yeung) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ponce-Francisco v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Central School District
83 A.D.3d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Janiak v. Ewall
88 A.D.3d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)