Xiu Jian Sun v. Dick Bailey Serv., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Xiu Jian Sun v. Dick Bailey Serv., Inc.

2016 NY Slip Op 6822

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 2016

Docket2016-00379

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 6822 (Xiu Jian Sun v. Dick Bailey Serv., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Xiu Jian Sun v. Dick Bailey Serv., Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 6822 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Xiu Jian Sun v Dick Bailey Serv., Inc. (2016 NY Slip Op 06822)

Xiu Jian Sun v Dick Bailey Serv., Inc.

2016 NY Slip Op 06822

Decided on October 19, 2016

Appellate Division, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 19, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2016-00379
(Index No. 11709/15)

[*1]Xiu Jian Sun, etc., appellant,

v

Dick Bailey Service, Inc., et al., respondents.

Xiu Jian Sun, Flushing, NY, appellant pro se.

John F. Clennan, Ronkonkoma, NY, for respondents.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Walker, J.), dated December 4, 2015, which granted the defendants' motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

ORDERED that order is affirmed, with costs.

"In deciding a motion to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, the court must accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory" (Fough v August Aichhorn Ctr. for Adolescent Residential Care, Inc., 139 AD3d 665, 666; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88).

In this case, the complaint does not set forth any legal theory, nor does it assert any fact in support of a legal theory. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

DILLON, J.P., ROMAN, HINDS-RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI