Xilinx, Inc. v. CIR
This text of 592 F.3d 1017 (Xilinx, Inc. v. CIR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
XILINX, INC., and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellant.
Xilinx, Inc., and Consolidated Subsidiaries, Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Tyler Alexander Baker, Esquire, Kenneth B. Clark, Esquire, Ronald B. Schrotenboer, Fenwick & West LLP, Mountain View, CA, Edward C. Dumont, Seth P. Waxman, Wilmerhale LLP, Washington, DC, for Petitioner-Appellee.
John M. Breen, Esquire, Internal Revenue Service, Richard Farber, Esquire, Michael *1018 J. Haungs, Richard T. Morrison, Esquire, Eileen J. O'Connor, Esquire, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Esquire DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Robert R. Di Trolio, Esquire, Clerk, U.S. Tax Court, Donald L. Korb, Esquire, Acting Chief Counsel, Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellant.
Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT, JOHN T. NOONAN, and RAYMOND C. FISHER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The opinion and dissent filed on May 27, 2009 are hereby WITHDRAWN.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
592 F.3d 1017, 2010 WL 101808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xilinx-inc-v-cir-ca9-2010.