Xiandong Xie v. Holder

333 F. App'x 786
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2009·No. No. 08-1951·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Xiandong Xie, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2009). We ac[787] cordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Xie (B.I.A. July 29, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Xiandong Xie v. Holder, 333 F. App'x 786 (4th Cir. 2009).

333 F. App'x 786 (Xiandong Xie v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related