Xi Dan Tang v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
This text of 356 F. App'x 910 (Xi Dan Tang v. Eric H. Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Xi Dan Tang petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her December 2007 motion to reopen. After careful review, we conclude the BIA acted within its discretion both in denying the motion to reopen as untimely because it was filed more than 90 days after the BIA’s November 2002 final order, and in refusing to waive the time limitation because Tang failed to show *911 changed country conditions since her 2001 removal hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7)(C)(i), (ii); Li Yun Lin v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1164, 1165-66 (8th Cir.2008); Zheng v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 869, 871-72 (8th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 F. App'x 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xi-dan-tang-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca8-2009.