Xerox Corp. v. Department of Finance & Administration

18 Ct. Cl. 52
CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 26, 1990
DocketCC-90-7
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Ct. Cl. 52 (Xerox Corp. v. Department of Finance & Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Xerox Corp. v. Department of Finance & Administration, 18 Ct. Cl. 52 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and the respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $444.90 for maintenance services for office equipment provided respondent. Respondent, while admitting the validity of the claim states that there were insufficient funds remaining in its appropriation for the fiscal year in question with which the claim could be paid.

While this is a claim which in equity and good conscience should be paid, the Court finds that an award cannot be made based on the decision in Airkem Sales & Service, et. al. vs. Department of Mental Health, 8 Ct.Cl. 180 (1971).

Claim is disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Airkem Sales & Service v. Department of Mental Health
8 Ct. Cl. 180 (West Virginia Court of Claims, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Ct. Cl. 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/xerox-corp-v-department-of-finance-administration-wvctcl-1990.