WYZYKOWSKI, BARRY, PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 26, 2014
DocketKA 13-01585
StatusPublished

This text of WYZYKOWSKI, BARRY, PEOPLE v (WYZYKOWSKI, BARRY, PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WYZYKOWSKI, BARRY, PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

982 KA 13-01585 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BARRY WYZYKOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MATTHEW B. POWERS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), rendered July 25, 2008. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal sexual act in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.50 [4]). To the extent that defendant’s contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing survives his guilty plea, we conclude that it lacks merit (see People v LaCroce, 83 AD3d 1388, 1388, lv denied 17 NY3d 807). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in failing to recuse itself (see People v Prado, 4 NY3d 725, 726, rearg denied 4 NY3d 795; People v Dewiel, 100 AD3d 1524, 1525, lv denied 20 NY3d 1010). In any event, that contention is without merit (see generally People v Glynn, 21 NY3d 614, 618; People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406; People v Williams, 57 AD3d 1440, 1441, lv denied 12 NY3d 789).

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Prado
823 N.E.2d 824 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
People v. Glynn
999 N.E.2d 1137 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Moreno
516 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Williams
57 A.D.3d 1440 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. LaCroce
83 A.D.3d 1388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Dewiel
100 A.D.3d 1524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
WYZYKOWSKI, BARRY, PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyzykowski-barry-people-v-nyappdiv-2014.