Wyrich v. Social Security Administration

District Court, M.D. Tennessee·Decided July 22, 2022·No. 3:20-cv-00682·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

JAMES C. WYRICH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-00682 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. No. 29), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. No. 29, “Motion”) be granted and that the Court award payment for attorney and paralegal time in the amount of $6,602.43 and expenses in the amount of $17.25. The Social Security Administration (SSA) does not oppose the Motion (Doc. No. 31), and (not surprisingly) no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The failure to object to a report and recommendation releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Frias v. Frias, No. 2:18-cv-00076, 2019 WL 549506, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2019); Hart v. Bee Property Mgmt., No. 18-cv-11851, 2019 WL 1242372, at * 1 (E.D. Mich. March 18, 2019) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)). The district court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, those aspects of the report and recommendation to which no objection is made. Ashraf v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 3d 879, 881 (W.D. Tenn. 2018); Benson v. Walden Security, No. 3:18-cv-0010, 2018 WL 6322332, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2018). The district court should adopt the magistrate judge’s findings and rulings to which no specific objection is filed. Id. Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion (Doc. No. 29) is GRANTED. The Court awards payment for attorney and paralegal time in the amount of $6,602.43 and expenses in the amount of $17.25, and holds that, as indicated in the Report and Recommendation, the award be payable by the Social Security Administration subject to offset to satisfy any pre-existing debt that Plaintiff owes to the United States. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Chi Richerdaen _ ELI RICHARDSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyrich v. Social Security Administration, (M.D. Tenn. 2022).

Wyrich v. Social Security Administration (Wyrich v. Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)
Ashraf v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc.
322 F. Supp. 3d 879 (W.D. Tennessee, 2018)