Wyoming v. Udall

255 F. Supp. 481, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 974, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8209
CourtDistrict Court, D. Wyoming
DecidedJune 30, 1966
DocketCiv. No. 4913
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 255 F. Supp. 481 (Wyoming v. Udall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Wyoming primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyoming v. Udall, 255 F. Supp. 481, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 974, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8209 (D. Wyo. 1966).

Opinion

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

KERR, District Judge.

The above entitled matter having come on regularly before the Court, John F. Raper, Attorney General of the State of Wyoming, and Dean Borthwick, Deputy Attorney General, appearing as counsel for the State of Wyoming, and A. G. McClintock and Roger Allen appearing as counsel for plaintiff Gulf Oil Corporation, Robert N. Chaffin, United States Attorney for Wyoming, and Thomas L. McKevitt, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., appearing as counsel for defendants, and F. J. Melia, J. H. Anderson, E. T. Lazear, and Frederick G. Loomis appearing as counsel for [482]*482Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenor, the Court heard the arguments of counsel; and having taken the matter under advisement, carefully examined the record on file herein, including the Stipulation of Facts to which all the parties agreed, and their exhibits on file herein, and the memorandum briefs submitted by all counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, the Court does hereby make the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT.

1. This is a civil action in which plaintiffs seek a judicial review of the order and ruling of the Secretary of Interior acting through his authorized delegate, the Solicitor, in decision of the Solicitor dated February 16, 1965 (72 I.D. 76), in Wyoming 0105263 and 085043, and a declaration that said order and ruling are null and void; and plaintiffs seek also a declaratory judgment that the State of Wyoming is the owner of all the oil and gas underlying the right of way of Union Pacific Railroad Company in Section 16, Township 18 North, and Section 36, Township 19 North, Range 99 West, 6th P.M., Wyoming, and a declaratory judgment that the Secretary of Interior, acting through his authorized delegate, the Assistant Manager, Oil & Gas, of the Cheyenne, Wyoming Office of the Bureau of Land Management, had and have no power or authority to issue oil and gas leases covering the oil and gas underlying such right of way pursuant to the Act of May 21, 1930 (46 Stat. 373, 30 U.S.C. §§ 301-306), or any other federal act. Plaintiffs seek also an order enjoining Stewart L. Udall, the Secretary of the Interior, Ed Pierson, Supervisor for the State of Wyoming, Bureau of Land Management, and David B. Morgan, Assistant Manager, Oil and Gas, Cheyenne, Wyoming Office of the Bureau of Land Management, from taking any further action to invite, receive, or act upon bids under the Act of May 21,1930, or any other federal act, for the issuance of oil and gas leases covering the oil and gas underlying such right of way.

2. Gulf Oil Corporation, hereinafter referred to as Gulf, is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Pennsylvania. Its principal office is in the city of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It has and is now qualified to do business in the State of Wyoming.

3. Defendant Stewart L. Udall is a resident of the District of Columbia and is the duly appointed, qualified and acting Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America. Defendants Ed Pierson and David B. Morgan, hereinafter referred to as Pierson and Morgan, are each citizens of the State of Wyoming, Pierson being the duly appointed, qualified and acting Supervisor and Morgan being the duly appointed, qualified and acting Assistant Manager, Oil and Gas, of the Cheyenne, Wyoming Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior.

4. Intervenor, Union Pacific Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as Union Pacific, is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Utah. Its principal place of business is in the city of Omaha, Nebraska. It has qualified to do business in the State of Wyoming, and is now engaged in the ownership and operation of a railroad in Wyoming which traverses the land involved in this action.

5. The question involved herein is whether the Secretary of the Interior has authority to dispose of oil and gas deposits in the Union Pacific right of way under the Act of May 21, 1930 (46 Stat. 373), as property of the United States, or whether the Secretary lacks such authority because the minerals retained by the United States under the railroad grant subsequently passed to the State of Wyoming under the Act of July 10, 1890 (26 Stat. 222), granting school land to the State. Exclusive of interest and costs, the value of oil and gas rights underlying the land in question is in excess of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.-00).

[483]*4836. By the Act of July 1, 1862 (12 Stat. 489), as amended by the Act of July 2, 1864 (13 Stat. 356), the United States granted to a predecessor in title of the Union Pacific a right of way 400 feet in width through tne public lands of the United States for the construction of a railroad and telegraph line. Union Pacific succeeded to the rights of the original grantee under said Acts and it and its predecessors have complied in all respects with the provisions of the said Acts, and a predecessor of Union Pacific constructed a railroad and telegraph line on said right of way. Union Pacific, or a predecessor thereof, is now and has been at all times pertinent hereto using the right of way for the purposes set forth in said Acts. No portion of the right of way involved in this action has been abandoned.

7. The survey of Township 18 North, Range 99 West, 6th P.M., duly approved by the Surveyor General, was filed in the Cheyenne Land Office effective as of September 8, 1877, and the survey of Township 19 North, Range 99 West, 6th P.M., duly approved by the Surveyor General, was filed in the Cheyenne Land Office effective as of December 20, 1884, and each purports to show the center line of Union Pacific’s railroad as actually constructed by a predecessor under the Acts of July 1,1862, and July 2,1864, prior to 1877 but no earlier than 1868, traversing a part of Sections 16 and 36 involved herein. At the time of approval of the surveys referred to above and upon adoption of the Act of July 10, 1890 (26 Stat. 222), admitting the Territory of Wyoming to Statehood, Sections 16 and 36 involved herein were not known to be mineral in character.

8. By the Act of July 10, 1890 (26 Stat. 222), the United States granted to the State of Wyoming sections numbered 16 and 36 in every township of Wyoming for the support of the common schools, or equivalent lands in lieu thereof where Sections 16 and 36 or any parts thereof had been sold or otherwise disposed of by or under the authority of any Act of Congress. All mineral lands were exempted from said grants, and the state was authorized to select unappropriated lands in lieu of any sections 16 and 36 or parts thereof found by the Department of the Interior to be mineral lands.

9. No in lieu selection pursuant to Section 4 of the Act of July 10, 1890, and Section 2275 of the Revised Statutes (43 U.S.C. § 851) has ever been made by the State of Wyoming for land equivalent to the land occupied by Union Pacific as its right of way under the foregoing Acts.

10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Wyo. v. Andrus
436 F. Supp. 933 (D. Wyoming, 1977)
Rice v. United States
348 F. Supp. 254 (D. North Dakota, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 F. Supp. 481, 25 Oil & Gas Rep. 974, 1966 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyoming-v-udall-wyd-1966.