Wyoming v. Colorado

353 U.S. 953, 77 S. Ct. 865
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 13, 1957
Docket3, Original
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 353 U.S. 953 (Wyoming v. Colorado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyoming v. Colorado, 353 U.S. 953, 77 S. Ct. 865 (1957).

Opinion

Upon consideration of the joint motion of counsel for the parties in this case to vacate the former decree (259 U. S. 496; 260 U. S. 1), it is ordered that the joint motion be, and it is hereby, granted and the former decree, as amended, is vacated and a new decree is entered to read as follows:

“It Is Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that:

“I. The State of Colorado, or anyone recognized by her as duly entitled thereto, shall have the right to divert from the Laramie river and its tributaries, for use in the State of Colorado, 49,375 acre-feet of water in each calendar year, which diversion and use shall be subject to the limitations and restrictions hereinafter set forth. The State of Wyoming, or anyone recognized by her as duly entitled thereto, shall have the right to divert and use all water flowing and remaining in the Laramie river and its tributaries after such diversion and use in Colorado.

“II. The State of Colorado, its officers, attorneys, agents and employees be, and they are severally enjoined

“(a) from diverting or permitting the diversion of more than 19,875 acre-feet of water in any calendar *954 year from the Laramie river and its tributaries for use in Colorado at any or all points outside of the basin of said river, which amount may be diverted by the present owners of transmountain water rights or by their successors in ownership, through any ditches, canals, tunnels or structures capable of carrying the same, as the owners of said water rights and of such structures may from time to time agree among themselves, or as may be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction;
“(b) from diverting or permitting the diversion of more than 29,500 acre-feet of water in any calendar year from the Laramie river and its tributaries for use in Colorado within the' drainage basin of said river, of which amount not more than 1,800 acre-feet shall be diverted in any calendar year after July 31; provided, that if in any calendar year any part or all of said 19,875 acre-feet of water which may be diverted for use outside of the drainage basin of said river is not so diverted for use outside the drainage basin of said river, the amount not so diverted may be added to the amount which may be diverted hereunder for use in Colorado within the drainage basin of said river. Such water diverted for use in Colorado within the drainage basin of said river shall be diverted only through the headgates of ditches serving, and shall only be used to irrigate, those lands within the Laramie river basin in Colorado which are marked and designed by cross-hatching on Exhibit ‘A’ attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof, by the present owners of said lands and the water rights serving said lands or by their successors in ownership, and none of said waters shall be used for the irrigation of any lands not included within the boundaries of the lands so indicated on Exhibit ‘A’.

*0

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner County
554 N.W.2d 151 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)
People Ex Rel. Simpson v. Highland Irrigation Co.
917 P.2d 1242 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1996)
Nebraska v. Wyoming
507 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1993)
No.
Colorado Attorney General Reports, 1985
Sporhase v. Nebraska Ex Rel. Douglas
458 U.S. 941 (Supreme Court, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 U.S. 953, 77 S. Ct. 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyoming-v-colorado-scotus-1957.