Wynter v. Victoria's Secret Stores, LLC

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK tr rr er et et rr er re er ee er er er rr ee te ere ee eee eH HX CYNN WINTER, Plaintiff(s), -against- 20-cv-2429 (LAK)

VICTORIA’S SECRET, INC., et ano., Defendant(s) tr rr er et et rr er re er ee er er er rr ee te ere ee eee eH HX

ORDER

LEwIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: O The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996). O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 □□□□ 195 (1990). Vv The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). O The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. O The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before April 6, 2020, of an amended notice of removal adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, the action will be remanded. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 21, 2020

/s/ Lewis A. Kaplan Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge