Wynns v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Wynns v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

106 S.E. 136, 181 N.C. 477, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 109

DecidedMarch 2, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 136 (Wynns v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wynns v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 106 S.E. 136, 181 N.C. 477, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 109 (N.C. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Upon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor’s refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury,,. under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

Upon the argument of this cause, defendants relied entirely upon their motion for judgment as of nonsuit, assigning as error his Honor’s refusal to grant the same. Considering the evidence in its most favorable light for the plaintiff, the accepted position on such motion, we think the testimony was sufficient to be submitted to the jury,,. under authority of Ramsbottom v. R. R., 138 N. C., 38.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 S.E. 136, 181 N.C. 477, 1921 N.C. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynns-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack