Wynnewood Refining v. EPA

Opinion

Case: 22-60266 Document: 483-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/07/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

___________ FILED August 7, 2025 No. 22-60266 Lyle W. Cayce ___________ Clerk

Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.; Placid Refining Company, L.L.C., Ergon Refining, Incorporated; Wynnewood Refining Company, L.L.C.,

Petitioners,

versus

United States Environmental Protection Agency,

Respondent,

consolidated with ___________

No. 22-60425 ___________

Wynnewood Refining Company, L.L.C.; Calumet Shreveport Refining, L.L.C.; San Antonio Refinery, L.L.C.;

Respondent, Case: 22-60266 Document: 483-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/07/2025

No. 22-60266 c/w Nos. 22-60425, 22-60433, 22-60434

No. 22-60433 ___________

Ergon Refining, Incorporated; Ergon-West Virginia, Incorporated,

No. 22-60434 ___________

Placid Refining Company, L.L.C.,

Petitioner,

Respondent.

2 Case: 22-60266 Document: 483-1 Page: 3 Date Filed: 08/07/2025

______________________________

Petitions for Review of Orders of the Environmental Protection Agency Agency No. 87 Fed. Reg. 24300 Agency No. EPA-420-R-22-011 Agency No. 87 Fed. Reg. 34873 ______________________________

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before Elrod, Chief Judge, Higginbotham and Smith, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: The Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded, holding that the actions under review were based on determinations of nationwide scope or effect and that venue is therefore proper only in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. 605 U.S. ---, 145 S. Ct. 1735, 1752 (2025). On remand, the parties agree that we should transfer these petitions for review. The petitions for review are TRANSFERRED to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Any outstanding motions are DENIED.