Wynne v. Stonecypher

90 S.E. 284, 146 Ga. 5, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 537
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 17, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 284 (Wynne v. Stonecypher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wynne v. Stonecypher, 90 S.E. 284, 146 Ga. 5, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 537 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Hill, J.

The decision this day made in the case of Swearengen v. State, ante, 3 (90 S. E. 283), certified by the Court of Appeals to this Court, controls the present case as to the questions 1 (a) and (5), above set forth. Under that ruling each of them is answered in the affirmative.

Under the Penal Code, § 1105, the defendant in a criminal case becomes liable for costs upon his conviction; and where he fails to obtain a supersedeas, there is nothing to prevent judgment therefor being awarded against him. The second question is also answered in the affirmative.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wynne v. Smith
98 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Wynne v. Stonecypher
90 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 284, 146 Ga. 5, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynne-v-stonecypher-ga-1916.