Wynne v. Stonecypher

90 S.E. 284, 146 Ga. 5, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 537
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 17, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

The decision this day made in the case of Swearengen v. State, ante, 3 (90 S. E. 283), certified by the Court of Appeals to this Court, controls the present case as to the questions 1 (a) and (5), above set forth. Under that ruling each of them is answered in the affirmative.

Under the Penal Code, § 1105, the defendant in a criminal case becomes liable for costs upon his conviction; and where he fails to obtain a supersedeas, there is nothing to prevent judgment therefor being awarded against him. The second question is also answered in the affirmative.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynne v. Stonecypher, 90 S.E. 284, 146 Ga. 5, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 537 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 284 (Wynne v. Stonecypher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wynne v. Smith
98 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Wynne v. Stonecypher
90 S.E. 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)