Wynne v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Wynne v. State

170 S.W. 308, 75 Tex. Crim. 105, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 439

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 21, 1914·No. No. 3257.·Published

Opinion

PBEHDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of the theft of cattle and the lowest punishment assessed.

The court gave a correct and apt charge to the jury. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. The only assignments in the motion for new trial are: First, the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence. We have carefully read the evidence and it is amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Second, he attempts to complain of certain paragraphs of the court’s charge. Ho objection whatever is shown to have been made to the charge at the proper time. The only complaint is made in the motion for new trial. Therefore, this complaint can not be considered.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PBEHDEBGAST, Presiding Judge.

—Appellant was convicted of the theft of cattle and the lowest punishment assessed.

The court gave a correct and apt charge to the jury. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. The only assignments in the motion for new trial are: First, the verdict was contrary to the law and evidence. We have carefully read the evidence and it is amply sufficient to sustain the conviction. Second, he attempts to complain of certain paragraphs of the court’s charge. Ho objection whatever is shown to have been made to the charge at the proper time. The only complaint is made in the motion for new trial. Therefore, this complaint can not be considered.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Wynne v. State, 170 S.W. 308, 75 Tex. Crim. 105, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 439 (Tex. 1914).

Pincite

170 S.W. 308 (Wynne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.