Wynne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wynne v. State

872 S.W.2d 528, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 1994 WL 23799

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1994·No. No. 64031·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kathen Roy Wynne, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing property of a value of $150.00 or more for which movant was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to imprisonment for twelve years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kathen Roy Wynne, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.036 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The judgment of conviction sought to be vacated was for stealing property of a value of $150.00 or more for which movant was sentenced, as a prior and persistent offender, to imprisonment for twelve years.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.

The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Wynne v. State, 872 S.W.2d 528, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 155, 1994 WL 23799 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

872 S.W.2d 528 (Wynne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.