Wynne v. State
This text of 134 S.E. 181 (Wynne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence. The ground, however, does not set forth the evidence either literally or in substance, nor is such evidence attached as an exhibit to the ground. It follows, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, that the ground is too defective to be considered by this court.
2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 S.E. 181, 35 Ga. App. 666, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynne-v-state-gactapp-1926.