Wynne v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wynne v. State

134 S.E. 181, 35 Ga. App. 666, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1071

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided August 4, 1926·No. 17496·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J. 1.

The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence. The ground, however, does not set forth the evidence either literally or in substance, nor is such evidence attached as an exhibit to the ground. It follows, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, that the ground is too defective to be considered by this court.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J.,‘ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J. 1.

The single ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial complains of the admission of certain documentary evidence. The ground, however, does not set forth the evidence either literally or in substance, nor is such evidence attached as an exhibit to the ground. It follows, under repeated rulings of this court and of the Supreme Court, that the ground is too defective to be considered by this court.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J.,‘ concur.

Wynne v. State, 134 S.E. 181, 35 Ga. App. 666, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1071 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

134 S.E. 181 (Wynne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related