Wynne v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Wynne v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co.

252 So. 3d 896

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 21, 2018·No. NO. 2018-CC-677·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Granted. We find the court of appeal erred in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction to review the partial summary judgment, as the requirements of Herlitz Const. Co. v. Hotel Investors , 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981), are not satisfied. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Hughes, J., would deny the writ.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Granted. We find the court of appeal erred in exercising its supervisory jurisdiction to review the partial summary judgment, as the requirements of Herlitz Const. Co. v. Hotel Investors , 396 So.2d 878 (La. 1981), are not satisfied. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and set aside, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

Hughes, J., would deny the writ.

GENOVESE, J., would deny.

Wynne v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co., 252 So. 3d 896 (La. 2018).

Pincite

252 So. 3d 896 (Wynne v. Kan. City S. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related