Wynne & Son v. Paulk
This text of 129 S.E. 288 (Wynne & Son v. Paulk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. One who, to the damage of another, disposes of property upon which the latter possesses a lien, is not liable for such act unless at the time he had actual knowledge of the existence of the lien. DeVaughn v. Harris, 103 Ga. 102 (29 S. E. 613).
2. In a suit by the lienholder against one who it was alleged has wrongfully and to the plaintiff’s damage secreted certain personal property upon which the plaintiff held a mortgage, where it did not appear that the defendant, who had bought the property, had had actual notice of the plaintiff’s lien before the property had been secreted by the defendant and had passed beyond his control, a verdict for the defendant was properly directed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 S.E. 288, 34 Ga. App. 288, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynne-son-v-paulk-gactapp-1925.