Wynn v. Thompkins
This text of 902 F.2d 1567 (Wynn v. Thompkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
902 F.2d 1567
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James O. WYNN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert C. THOMPKINS, Individually and in his capacity as
Montgomery County Police; Frank Mathis, Individually and in
his capacity as Montgomery County Police; Harry Grechreng,
Individually and in his capacity as Montgomery County
Police: Media Service Officer; Bernard Crooke, Chief of
Police Montgomery County, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-7186.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 25, 1990.
Decided May 2, 1990.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 87-93-HM)
James O. Wynn, appellant pro se.
Bruce P. Sherman, Paul A. McGuckian, County Attorney's Office, Rockville, Md., for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and HARRISON L. WINTER, Senior Circuit Judge.*
PER CURIAM:
James O. Wynn appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wynn v. Thompkins, CA-87-93-HM (D.Md. June 30, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Judge Winter participated in the consideration of this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46(d)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
902 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7032, 1990 WL 64767, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-thompkins-ca4-1990.