Wynn v. State

800 S.W.2d 773, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 1990 WL 175730
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 1990·No. No. 58592·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Movant appeals after the trial court dismissed his Rule 29.15 motion. His motion was not timely filed. Movant concedes that the Missouri Supreme Court has ruled adversely to his position on this issue in other cases. See Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692 (Mo. banc 1989). An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynn v. State, 800 S.W.2d 773, 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 1645, 1990 WL 175730 (Mo. Ct. App. 1990).

800 S.W.2d 773 (Wynn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Day v. State
770 S.W.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1989)