Wynn v. State

110 S.E. 633, 28 Ga. App. 120, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 336
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 18, 1922
Docket13048
StatusPublished

This text of 110 S.E. 633 (Wynn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wynn v. State, 110 S.E. 633, 28 Ga. App. 120, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 336 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction of larceny, beyond a reasonable doubt and to the exclusion of every reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt. It was therefore error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. A. H. Freeman, for plaintiff in error. William Y. Atkinson, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 633, 28 Ga. App. 120, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-state-gactapp-1922.