Wynn v. State
This text of 394 So. 2d 225 (Wynn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Both parties to this appeal agree, however, that the judgment contains a scrivener’s error; i. e., it recites that appellant entered a plea of guilty to the charge for which she was convicted when, in fact, she pled not guilty and was found guilty by a jury. The judgment is therefore modified to reflect that appellant was tried and found guilty by a jury of the offense of burglary of a dwelling. As so modified, the judgment and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
394 So. 2d 225, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-state-fladistctapp-1981.