Wynn v. Richard Allen Lodge No. 14

42 S.E. 29, 115 Ga. 796, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 602
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 12, 1902·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. It is essential to the validity of a summons issuing from a justice’s court for the purpose of instituting an action therein that some persorL should be named as defendant. Accordingly, a summons which names as a defendant “ Richard Allen Lodge No. 14, Knights of Pythias,” is fatally defective, in that it does not disclose that such lodge is either a corporation or a partnership and therefore subject to suit. Barbour v. Albany Lodge, 73 Ga. 474, followed in Thurmond v. Cedar Spring Baptist Church, 110 Ga. 816.

•2. The ruling above announced disposes of the only question made and argued in the present case; and it follows that there was no error in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynn v. Richard Allen Lodge No. 14, 42 S.E. 29, 115 Ga. 796, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 602 (Ga. 1902).

42 S.E. 29 (Wynn v. Richard Allen Lodge No. 14) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Commissioners of Roads & Revenue
31 S.E.2d 648 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Walker v. Ful-Kalb Inc.
183 S.E. 776 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Eslinger v. Herndon
124 S.E. 169 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Langford v. Mount Zion Baptist Church
97 S.E. 102 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Hill v. Armour Fertilizer Works
80 S.E. 294 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
Roberts v. Tift
72 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Clark Bros. v. Wyche
54 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Dalton Marble Works
50 S.E. 978 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)