Wynn v. Mundo

142 F. App'x 193
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 1, 2005·No. No. 05-6859·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Mark Allen Wynn appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wynn v. Correctional Officer Mundo, No. CA-04-365-FWB (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Wynn’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynn v. Mundo, 142 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2005).

142 F. App'x 193 (Wynn v. Mundo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LEWIS v. BRATHWAITE
M.D. North Carolina, 2021
ATKINSON v. FRICK
M.D. North Carolina, 2021
BENGE v. RANDOLPH COUNTY
M.D. North Carolina, 2020
Langley v. Dr. Charles Lye
S.D. West Virginia, 2020
HARRIS v. POOLE
M.D. North Carolina, 2020
Smith v. Walker
845 F. Supp. 2d 673 (W.D. North Carolina, 2012)