Wynn v. Mundo
This text of 142 F. App'x 193 (Wynn v. Mundo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mark Allen Wynn appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wynn v. Correctional Officer Mundo, No. CA-04-365-FWB (M.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Wynn’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-mundo-ca4-2005.