Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

625 A.2d 1379, 226 Conn. 907, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 4, 1993
DocketSC 14788
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 625 A.2d 1379 (Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 625 A.2d 1379, 226 Conn. 907, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 181 (Colo. 1993).

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes § 52-410?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff’s application to compel arbitration?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Connecticut Ins., No. Cv 94 053 84 66 (Sep. 26, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 9789 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
635 A.2d 814 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. Raphael
635 A.2d 1232 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 1379, 226 Conn. 907, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-metropolitan-property-casualty-insurance-conn-1993.