Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

625 A.2d 1379, 226 Conn. 907, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 181
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 4, 1993·No. SC 14788·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 803 (AC 11170), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations defense was a threshold issue which the trial court could decide without referring the same to the arbitrators in light of the positive assurance test for arbitrability and General Statutes § 52-410?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the statute of limitations had run prior to the filing of the plaintiff’s application to compel arbitration?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance, 625 A.2d 1379, 226 Conn. 907, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 181 (Colo. 1993).

625 A.2d 1379 (Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Connecticut Ins., No. Cv 94 053 84 66 (Sep. 26, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 9789 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)
Wynn v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
635 A.2d 814 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)
Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. Raphael
635 A.2d 1232 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1994)