Wynn v. Manpower International, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wynn v. Manpower International, Inc.

189 S.W.3d 180, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2006 WL 618847

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 14, 2006

DocketNo. ED 87362

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 189 S.W.3d 180 (Wynn v. Manpower International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wynn v. Manpower International, Inc., 189 S.W.3d 180, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2006 WL 618847 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

GLENN A. NORTON, Chief Judge.

Warren Wynn (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial [181]*181Relations Commission regarding his unemployment benefits. Because his notice of appeal to this Court is untimely, the appeal is dismissed.

A deputy from the Division of Employment Security concluded Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he failed, without good cause, to apply for available suitable work. Claimant appealed to the Appeals Tribunal, which dismissed his appeal. Claimant then filed an application for review with the Commission, which affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s decision on November 9, 2005. Claimant filed a notice of appeal to this Court on December 10,2005.

The Division of Employment Security has filed a motion to dismiss Claimant’s appeal, contending his notice of appeal to this Court is untimely. Claimant has.not filed a response.

A claimant has twenty days to file a notice of appeal from the Commission’s final decision regarding unemployment. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. The Commission’s decision becomes final ten days after it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. Here, the Secretary for the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on November 9, 2005. The decision became final ten days later and Claimant’s notice of appeal was due on December 9, 2005. Sections 288.200.2, 288.210. Claimant filed his notice of appeal on December 10, 2005, one day out of time.

In an unemployment case, an untimely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Frenchie v. Division of Employment Sec., 156 S.W.3d 437, 438 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). Section 288.210 makes no provision for late filing of a notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to consider Claimant’s appeal.

The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted. Claimant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLENN A. NORTON, Chief Judge.

Warren Wynn (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial [181]*181Relations Commission regarding his unemployment benefits. Because his notice of appeal to this Court is untimely, the appeal is dismissed.

A deputy from the Division of Employment Security concluded Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because he failed, without good cause, to apply for available suitable work. Claimant appealed to the Appeals Tribunal, which dismissed his appeal. Claimant then filed an application for review with the Commission, which affirmed the Appeals Tribunal’s decision on November 9, 2005. Claimant filed a notice of appeal to this Court on December 10,2005.

The Division of Employment Security has filed a motion to dismiss Claimant’s appeal, contending his notice of appeal to this Court is untimely. Claimant has.not filed a response.

A claimant has twenty days to file a notice of appeal from the Commission’s final decision regarding unemployment. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. The Commission’s decision becomes final ten days after it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. Here, the Secretary for the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on November 9, 2005. The decision became final ten days later and Claimant’s notice of appeal was due on December 9, 2005. Sections 288.200.2, 288.210. Claimant filed his notice of appeal on December 10, 2005, one day out of time.

In an unemployment case, an untimely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Frenchie v. Division of Employment Sec., 156 S.W.3d 437, 438 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). Section 288.210 makes no provision for late filing of a notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App. E.D.2000). Therefore, we have no jurisdiction to consider Claimant’s appeal.

The Division’s motion to dismiss is granted. Claimant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE and BOOKER T. SHAW, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 S.W.3d 180, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 392, 2006 WL 618847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-manpower-international-inc-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack