Wynn v. Maddok

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wynn v. Maddok

129 S.E. 13, 34 Ga. App. 227, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 170

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 29, 1925

Docket16556

StatusPublished

This text of 129 S.E. 13 (Wynn v. Maddok) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wynn v. Maddok, 129 S.E. 13, 34 Ga. App. 227, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 170 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the court did not err: (a) in disallowing the proffered amendment to the defendant’s original plea in abatement; (6) in disallowing the defendant’s special plea in bar; (c) in dismissing the motion for a new trial.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award.of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the facts of the case the court did not err: (a) in disallowing the proffered amendment to the defendant’s original plea in abatement; (6) in disallowing the defendant’s special plea in bar; (c) in dismissing the motion for a new trial.

2. This court not being satisfied that the writ of error was prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error for the award.of damages is denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

129 S.E. 13, 34 Ga. App. 227, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-v-maddok-gactapp-1925.