Wynn v. Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided October 3, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-05071·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x

WILLIAM H. WYNN, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Isaac

Cornealious Wynn a/k/a Isaac C. Wynn, MEMORANDUM & ORDER and WAYMAN WYNN, 23-CV-5071(EK)(SJB)

Plaintiffs,

-against-

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE REALTY CORPORATION OF NEW YORK,

Defendant.

------------------------------------x

ERIC KOMITEE, United States District Judge: The Court has received Magistrate Judge Bulsara’s Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated August 21, 2024. ECF No. 6. Judge Bulsara recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), because Plaintiffs failed to serve Defendant within ninety days of filing the complaint and never justified their failure to effect timely service. Neither party has filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court reviews Judge Bulsara’s recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition; accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968 F. Supp. 2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). Having reviewed the record, I find no error and therefore adopt the R&R in its entirety. Thus, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close the case. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eric Komitee ERIC KOMITEE United States District Judge

Dated: October 3, 2024 Brooklyn, New York

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wynn v. Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York, (E.D.N.Y. 2024).

Wynn v. Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York (Wynn v. Household Finance Realty Corporation of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Grafman
968 F. Supp. 2d 480 (E.D. New York, 2013)