Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394

Nevada Supreme Court

Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394

DecidedJune 26, 2019

Docket78381

StatusUnpublished

This text of Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394 (Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394, (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WYNN RESORTS LIMITED; JOHN J. No. 78381 HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; JAY L. JOHNSON; ROBERT J. MILLER; PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T. RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V. SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D. BOONE WAYSON; AND MATTHEW MADDOX, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JUN 2 6 2019 LINDA MARIE BELL, CHIEF ELIZABETH A. BROWN DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERIkOr S=E C0URT By y 0\ e Respondents, DEPUTY CILERX CP and BRUCE BANNISTER; LANA TALAMAS; HOWARD MEADOWS; GERALD OONIGIAN; LARRY CLERKS; JOE TILLOTSON; JOHN KALISH; FLORENCE KALISH; MARVIN MYERS; WILLIAM CAPRONI; RODNEY V. JOHN; A. LARAIN JOHN; CLIFFORD NAZZARO; AND LAWRENCE WEINER, Real Parties in Interest. JOHN J. HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; No. 78394 JAY L. JOHNSON; ROBERT J. MILLER; PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T. RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V. SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D. BOONE WAYSON; AND MATTHEW MADDOX, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF Surrtam Coml. CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE or NEVADA

aliSOP) (0) 1947A t ei -274t3 LINDA MARIE BELL, Respondents, and THOMAS DINAPOLI, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order striking petitioners peremptory challenge. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is not warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); State ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 362 662 P.2d 1338, 1340 (1983). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J. Hardesty

0 414G4-0 ,J ,J Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge Snell & Wilmer, LLPfLas Vegas Kirkland & Ellis LLPfLos Angeles Kirkland & Ellis LLP/New York Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

WYNN RESORTS LIMITED; JOHN J. No. 78381 HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; JAY L. JOHNSON; ROBERT J. MILLER; PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T. RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V. SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D. BOONE WAYSON; AND MATTHEW MADDOX, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE JUN 2 6 2019 LINDA MARIE BELL, CHIEF ELIZABETH A. BROWN DISTRICT JUDGE, CLERIkOr S=E C0URT By y 0\ e Respondents, DEPUTY CILERX CP and BRUCE BANNISTER; LANA TALAMAS; HOWARD MEADOWS; GERALD OONIGIAN; LARRY CLERKS; JOE TILLOTSON; JOHN KALISH; FLORENCE KALISH; MARVIN MYERS; WILLIAM CAPRONI; RODNEY V. JOHN; A. LARAIN JOHN; CLIFFORD NAZZARO; AND LAWRENCE WEINER, Real Parties in Interest. JOHN J. HAGENBUCH; RAY R. IRANI; No. 78394 JAY L. JOHNSON; ROBERT J. MILLER; PATRICIA MULROY; CLARK T. RANDT, JR.; ALVIN V. SHOEMAKER; J. EDWARD VIRTUE; D. BOONE WAYSON; AND MATTHEW MADDOX, Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF Surrtam Coml. CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE or NEVADA

aliSOP) (0) 1947A t ei -274t3 LINDA MARIE BELL, Respondents, and THOMAS DINAPOLI, DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order striking petitioners peremptory challenge. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we conclude that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is not warranted. See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition); State ex rel. Dep't Transp. v. Thompson, 99 Nev. 358, 362 662 P.2d 1338, 1340 (1983). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

, J. Hardesty

0 414G4-0 ,J ,J Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, Chief Judge Snell & Wilmer, LLPfLas Vegas Kirkland & Ellis LLPfLos Angeles Kirkland & Ellis LLP/New York Kemp, Jones & Coulthard, LLP Eighth District Court Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Wynn Resorts Ltd. v. Dist. Ct. (Bannister) C/W 78394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynn-resorts-ltd-v-dist-ct-bannister-cw-78394-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack