Wynhoff v. Hunter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wynhoff v. Hunter

212 So. 2d 64, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1968

DocketNo. 67-646

StatusPublished

This text of 212 So. 2d 64 (Wynhoff v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wynhoff v. Hunter, 212 So. 2d 64, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and considered the arguments of counsel in the light of the record on appeal, and have reached the conclusion that there exists sufficient [65]*65competent evidence to support the jury verdict of appellees. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. See: Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Maiborne v. Kuntz, Fla.1952, 56 So.2d 720; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; McCormick, Evidence, § 228, p. 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and considered the arguments of counsel in the light of the record on appeal, and have reached the conclusion that there exists sufficient [65]*65competent evidence to support the jury verdict of appellees. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. See: Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Maiborne v. Kuntz, Fla.1952, 56 So.2d 720; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; McCormick, Evidence, § 228, p. 464.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 So. 2d 64, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wynhoff-v-hunter-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack