Wynhoff v. Hunter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wynhoff v. Hunter

212 So. 2d 64, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1968·No. No. 67-646·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and considered the arguments of counsel in the light of the record on appeal, and have reached the conclusion that there exists sufficient [65]*65competent evidence to support the jury verdict of appellees. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. See: Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Maiborne v. Kuntz, Fla.1952, 56 So.2d 720; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; McCormick, Evidence, § 228, p. 464.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the briefs and considered the arguments of counsel in the light of the record on appeal, and have reached the conclusion that there exists sufficient [65]*65competent evidence to support the jury verdict of appellees. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. See: Midstate Hauling Co. v. Fowler, Fla.1965, 176 So.2d 87; Maiborne v. Kuntz, Fla.1952, 56 So.2d 720; § 59.041, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; McCormick, Evidence, § 228, p. 464.

Wynhoff v. Hunter, 212 So. 2d 64, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5251 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

212 So. 2d 64 (Wynhoff v. Hunter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related