Wyndham Foundation, Inc. v. Oulton

Virginia Circuit Court

Wyndham Foundation, Inc. v. Oulton

57 Va. Cir. 78, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 516

CourtVirginia Circuit Court

DecidedJuly 25, 2001

DocketCase No. CH99-1468

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Va. Cir. 78 (Wyndham Foundation, Inc. v. Oulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Virginia Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyndham Foundation, Inc. v. Oulton, 57 Va. Cir. 78, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 516 (Va. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

By Judge L. A. Harris, Jr.

The court concludes that, both by statute and the covenants, restrictions, and bylaws applicable to this case, an award of attorney’s fees and costs is warranted in this matter. Therefore, after a consideration of the evidence presented on this issue, argument of counsel, and the applicable authorities, I award Wyndham Foundation, Inc., attorney’s fees in the amount of $82,000.00 plus costs of $5,858.58. A reasonable adjustment has been made to the fees requested because of the unusual aspects of the case involving the “temporary poles” and the “counterclaim.”

As previously noted, the poles must be removed by September 7,2001. In the same manner, the court will suspend execution of the judgment if the appropriate bond with surety is posted pursuant to the statute. The amount of the bond will be set after hearing comments from counsel on August 2, 2001.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By Judge L. A. Harris, Jr.

The court concludes that, both by statute and the covenants, restrictions, and bylaws applicable to this case, an award of attorney’s fees and costs is warranted in this matter. Therefore, after a consideration of the evidence presented on this issue, argument of counsel, and the applicable authorities, I award Wyndham Foundation, Inc., attorney’s fees in the amount of $82,000.00 plus costs of $5,858.58. A reasonable adjustment has been made to the fees requested because of the unusual aspects of the case involving the “temporary poles” and the “counterclaim.”

As previously noted, the poles must be removed by September 7,2001. In the same manner, the court will suspend execution of the judgment if the appropriate bond with surety is posted pursuant to the statute. The amount of the bond will be set after hearing comments from counsel on August 2, 2001.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Va. Cir. 78, 2001 Va. Cir. LEXIS 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyndham-foundation-inc-v-oulton-vacc-2001.