Wymer v. City of Sunset Hills

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wymer v. City of Sunset Hills

294 S.W.3d 94, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1400

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 29, 2009·No. ED 92636·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary B. Wymer appeals the judgment the circuit court finding her guilty of disturbing the peace in violation of section 16-2 of the City of Sunset Hills Code of Ordinances and ordering her to pay a $500 fine plus court costs. We find that grounds for reversal based on the claim of a defective information do not exist in this case. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mary B. Wymer appeals the judgment the circuit court finding her guilty of disturbing the peace in violation of section 16-2 of the City of Sunset Hills Code of Ordinances and ordering her to pay a $500 fine plus court costs. We find that grounds for reversal based on the claim of a defective information do not exist in this case. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Wymer v. City of Sunset Hills, 294 S.W.3d 94, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1400 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

294 S.W.3d 94 (Wymer v. City of Sunset Hills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related