Wymczak v. Niagara County Bd. of Elections

2025 NY Slip Op 31528(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, Niagara County
DecidedApril 29, 2025
DocketIndex No. E187161/2025
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 31528(U) (Wymczak v. Niagara County Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, Niagara County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wymczak v. Niagara County Bd. of Elections, 2025 NY Slip Op 31528(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

Wymczak v Niagara County Bd. of Elections 2025 NY Slip Op 31528(U) April 29, 2025 Supreme Court, Niagara County Docket Number: Index No. E187161/2025 Judge: Mario A. Giacobbe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. E187161/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2025

At a Special Term of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Niagara, at the Courthouse, 175 Hawley St, Part 3, Lockport, New York, on the 29th day of April, 2025

HON. MARIO A. GIACOBBE, J.C.C. NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF NIAGARA

SCOTT WYMCZAK, Objector, Index No.: E187161/2025 Petitioner, DECISION & JUDGMENT V.

NIAGARA COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS MARIA FABRIZIO, purported candidate,

Respondents.

Joseph T.Bums, Esq. Attorney for Petitioner

Brittany L. Penberthy, Esq. Attorney for Respondent Maria Fabrizio

Claude A. Joerg, Esq. Attorney for Respondent Niagara County Board of Elections

MARIO A. GIACOBBE, J.C.C.

This proceeding under Election Law §16-102 was commenced by Petitioner, Scott

Wymczak, to invalidate the Democratic Party designating petition of Respondent Maria Fabrizio

("Respondent Fabrizio") naming her as a candidate for Niagara County Legislator for District #15.

Petitioner filed general and specific objections pursuant to Election Law §6-154. This matter was

1 of 5 [* 1] INDEX NO. E187161/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2025

returnable on April 24, 2025, at which time counsel for parties appeared and a hearing was

scheduled.

A hearing was conducted on April 28, 2025. Petitioner called Jennifer Sandonato, Niagara

County Board of Elections Republican Commissioner, and Erin Norris, Niagara County Board of

Elections employee. Respondent Fabrizio called Molly Pasceri and Lora Allen, Niagara County

Board of Elections Democratic Commissioner.

The following items of evidence were received by the Court:

Petitioner's "A" - Petition Review Work Sheet, Designating Petition Cover Sheet

& Democratic Designating Petition Sheets #1 through #9 for Maria Fabrizio for the

Niagara County Legislative District #15

Petitioner's "B" - General Objection Forms

Petitioner's "C" - Voter Record Report

Respondents' "1" - Voter Card

Respondents' "2" - Specifications of Objections

This Court also reviewed the pleadings, affirmations and exhibits filed in NYSCEF as

Documents # 1 through # 12.

At the hearing, Commissioner Sandonato compared information relating to the name of

signor, residence and city/town information from Petitioner's "A" to the information relating to

the voter name, address and town found in Petitioner's "C." Commissioner Sandonato testified to

many instances where a signor or subscriber indicated the wrong town or city, or, in other

instances, indicated a village or hamlet instead of a town or city.

Commissioner Allen testified Respondent Board of Elections mailed Niagara County

voters "Exercise Your Right to Vote" cards containing information about the 2025 primary and

2 of 5 [* 2] INDEX NO. E187161/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2025

general elections (see Respondent's #1). On one side of Respondent's #1, the name and address of

Molly R. Pasceri is listed as "3632 Day Rd, Lockport NY 14094-9450." On the reverse side

Respondent's #1, the following information is displayed in the upper left hand comer of the card:

M085712 Your Party Affiliation is: DEM

Town Ward District NEWFANE 000 005

RESIDENCE 3632 DAY RD

ADDRESS: LOCKPORT NY 14094

Molly Pasceri testified she believed she resided in Lockport. But, turning to Respondent

Board of Election's Voter Record Report for Molly Pasceri, Page #1 of Petitioner's Exhibit "C",

her address is "3632 Day RD, LOCKPORT, NY 14094" and her "Town" designation is

"NEWFANE."

Sheets #1 through #6 of Petitioner's "A", contain a STATEMENT OF WITNESS section

displaying the information of "Molly R. Pasceri" at "3632 Day Road, Lockport, NY 14094." In

the WITNESS IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION section, the Town or City is "Lockport."

A designating petition "must set forth in every instance the name of the signer, his or her

residence address, town or city (except in the city of New York, the county), and the date when

the signature is affixed" (Stoppenbach v. Sweeney, 98 N.Y.2d 431,433 [2002]). A petition must

be invalidated if the signer or subscribing witness designates the incorrect town or city (see Zobel

v. New York State Bd. of Elections, 254 A.D.2d 520, 521 [3 rd Dept1998]). The designation of a

village in lieu of a town or city does not comply with Election Law §6-130 and "renders the

designating petition invalid" (Scamacca v. Mahoney, 104 A.D.2d 730 [4th Dept 1984]).

Petitions will not be dismissed when the subscribing witness places the correct city or town

designation in the "STATEMENT OF WITNESS" and yet places the incorrect city or town in the

3 of 5 [* 3] INDEX NO. E187161/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2025

"WITNESS IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION" (See Dalton v. Wayne Cnty. Bd. of Elections,

65 A.D.3d 817, 819 [4th Dept 2009]; see also Powers v. Kozlowski, 54 A.D.3d 540, 541 [4th Dept

2008]).

Unlike the situation in Dalton, supra, where a witness indicated a correct city or town

designation in the "STATEMENT OF WITNESS" but placed the incorrect city or town in the

"WITNESS IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION," Sheets #1 through #6 contain the incorrect

town or city for Ms. Pasceri in both the "STATEMENT OF WITNESS" and the WITNESS

IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION. Ms. Pasceri stated her residence was Lockport when,

according to Niagara County Board of Elections records, she should have indicated Newfane. The

Court can understand why Ms. Pasceri would have been confused about her city or town residency

designation based on testimony and evidence before the Court. However, in conformity with

Zobel, this Court finds Democratic Designating Sheets #1 through #6 of Petitioner's "A" are

invalid as the incorrect town is listed in both sections by the subscribing witness.

Even if Ms. Pasceri had designated her correct city or town on Sheets #1 through #6, it was

clear from Commissioner Sandonato's testimony that the following signatures indicated incorrect

cities or towns:

Sheet #2, Lines #1 through #20;

Sheet #3, Lines #1 through #11; and

Sheet #4, Lines #7 through #8.

Additionally, based on the testimony of Commissioner Sandonato, Democratic

Designating Sheet #7 of Petitioner's "A", Line #1, and Lines #3 through #20, all contain the

incorrect city or town. This Court finds Democratic Designating Sheet #7 of Petitioner's "A" to

4 of 5 [* 4] INDEX NO. E187161/2025 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 14 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/29/2025

be in invalid. Furthermore, Democratic Designating Sheets #8 of Petitioner's "A", Lines #1

through #6 also contain the incorrect city or town and are invalid.

This Court finds the two (2) signatures on Sheet #9 of Petitioner's A are valid.

It is the finding of this Court that Respondent Fabrizio's Democratic Designating Petition

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MTR OF STOPPENBACH v. Sweeney
778 N.E.2d 1040 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Powers v. Kozlowski
54 A.D.3d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Scamacca v. Mahoney
104 A.D.2d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Zobel v. New York State of Elections
254 A.D.2d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 31528(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wymczak-v-niagara-county-bd-of-elections-nysupctniagra-2025.