Wyman & Colegrove's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wyman & Colegrove's Appeal

3 Walker 410

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 15, 1883

DocketNo. 363

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Walker 410 (Wyman & Colegrove's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyman & Colegrove's Appeal, 3 Walker 410 (Pa. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Common Pleas on February 18th, 1884, in the following opinion,

Per Curiam:

The affidavit was too vague and uncertain to justify the Court in disturbing the judgment. -The nature and character of the facts must be averred with reasonable precision to enable the Court to say, if proved, they entitle the party [412]*412making the affidavit to equitable relief. In this case it was not done, and the Court committed no error in refusing to grant the rule.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Common Pleas on February 18th, 1884, in the following opinion,

Per Curiam:

The affidavit was too vague and uncertain to justify the Court in disturbing the judgment. -The nature and character of the facts must be averred with reasonable precision to enable the Court to say, if proved, they entitle the party [412]*412making the affidavit to equitable relief. In this case it was not done, and the Court committed no error in refusing to grant the rule.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Walker 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyman-colegroves-appeal-pa-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack