Wylie v. Barlow

18 Jones & S. 530
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMarch 26, 1884
StatusPublished

This text of 18 Jones & S. 530 (Wylie v. Barlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wylie v. Barlow, 18 Jones & S. 530 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1884).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The attorneyfor plaintiff has not appealed from the order but the plaintiff only.1' The order should be affirmed for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Ingraham below, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Jones & S. 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wylie-v-barlow-nysuperctnyc-1884.