Wyke v. Polk County School Board

137 F.3d 1292
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 1998
Docket95-2799
StatusPublished

This text of 137 F.3d 1292 (Wyke v. Polk County School Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyke v. Polk County School Board, 137 F.3d 1292 (11th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

PUBLISH

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 95-2799 ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 91-1457-Civ-T-24C

CAROL WYKE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Shawn David Wyke, a minor deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, MAX LINTON, individually and as Principal of McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County, and JAMES BUTLER, individually and as Vice- Principal of McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 95-3653 ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 91-1457-Civ-T-24C

CAROL WYKE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Shawn David Wyke, a minor deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

POLK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, MAX LINTON, individually and as Principal of McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County, and JAMES BUTLER, individually and as Vice- Principal of McLaughlin Junior High School of Polk County,

Defendants-Appellees.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________

(March 26, 1998)

Before ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and KRAVITCH and FAY, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In our earlier opinion in this matter, Wyke v. Polk County Sch. Bd., 129 F.3d 560 (11th Cir.

1997), we certified the following question to the Supreme Court of Florida:

Does Florida’s comparative fault statute, Fla. Stat. Ann. § 768.81 (West 1997

Supp.), require the allocation of “fault” between both negligent and intentional

tortfeasors?

Following our certification the Supreme Court of Florida decided the cases of Merrill Crossings

Assoc. v. McDonald, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S739 (Dec. 4, 1997), and Stellas v. Alamo Rent-A-Car,

702 So. 2d 232 (Fla. 1997). It appearing that the opinions rendered in these cases provided a clear

answer to the question certified, we withdraw the certification with the consent of the Supreme

Court of Florida.

The trial court in this matter refused to include the name of Shawn David Wyke on the verdict

form. That court ruled that the jury could not apportion liability to Shawn since he had not

committed a negligent act but rather an intentional one (suicide). This ruling was in accord with

what is now the clear law of Florida under Florida Statute § 768.81.

Having resolved all the issues presented in these matters, the judgment of the district court is

affirmed.

2 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 F.3d 1292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyke-v-polk-county-school-board-ca11-1998.