Wyka v. L. A. D. Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wyka v. L. A. D. Motors Corp.

264 A.D. 890, 36 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 890 (Wyka v. L. A. D. Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyka v. L. A. D. Motors Corp., 264 A.D. 890, 36 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, who was struck and killed by an automobile operated by defendant Benedicks. To [891]*891the automobile were attached dealer’s license plates belonging to respondent, the employer of Benedicks. The proof adduced on behalf of respondent was that Benedicks had stolen its license plates the day prior to the accident. Judgment dismissing the complaint as against respondent, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order granting motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff and against the respondent dismissed, without costs. There is no such order in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover damages for the wrongful death of plaintiff’s intestate, who was struck and killed by an automobile operated by defendant Benedicks. To [891]*891the automobile were attached dealer’s license plates belonging to respondent, the employer of Benedicks. The proof adduced on behalf of respondent was that Benedicks had stolen its license plates the day prior to the accident. Judgment dismissing the complaint as against respondent, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order granting motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff and against the respondent dismissed, without costs. There is no such order in the record. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 890, 36 N.Y.S.2d 244, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyka-v-l-a-d-motors-corp-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack