Wycoff v. Nix

16 F.3d 1230, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8653, 1994 WL 33973
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 9, 1994
Docket93-2569
StatusPublished

This text of 16 F.3d 1230 (Wycoff v. Nix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wycoff v. Nix, 16 F.3d 1230, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8653, 1994 WL 33973 (8th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

16 F.3d 1230
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Steven R. WYCOFF; Plaintiff;
Edward CLARK; Raymond McKettrick; Donald Saffell; Danny
Rankins; Tyrone Davis; Ronald A. Mahers; Gary
Brown; Fred Ruble, Appellants,
v.
Crispus C. NIX; John Emmett; Successor to John Henry;
Robert Washington; Roger Lawson, Appellees.

No. 93-2569.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: February 1, 1994.
Filed: February 9, 1994.

Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Iowa State Penitentiary inmates Edward Clark, Raymond McKettrick, Donald Saffell, Danny Rankins, Tyrone Davis, Ronald A. Mahers, Gary Brown, and Fred Ruble appeal the District Court's1 judgment for defendant prison officials following a bench trial in this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. On appeal, appellants contend that their counsel was ineffective and that the District Court erred in its ruling. As this is a civil action, there is no right to effective counsel. Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988). The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies only in criminal matters. We cannot review the District Court's factual findings because appellants neither provided a trial transcript as required by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(b), nor requested one at government expense. See Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners, 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (appellant's failure to provide a complete transcript makes it impossible to review evidence presented at trial), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1071 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm.

1

The Honorable Charles R. Wolle, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dennis Glick v. Dr. F.M. Henderson
855 F.2d 536 (Eighth Circuit, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F.3d 1230, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8653, 1994 WL 33973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wycoff-v-nix-ca8-1994.