Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

49 N.J. Eq. 344
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1892·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor.

For affirmance — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Reed, Scudder, Bogert, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 9.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Magie, Van Syckel, Brown — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff, 49 N.J. Eq. 344 (N.J. 1892).

49 N.J. Eq. 344 (Wyckoff v. Wyckoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arenofsky v. Arenofsky
102 A.2d 101 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
D'Arcangelo v. D'Arcangelo
43 A.2d 169 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)