Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

49 N.J. Eq. 344
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 N.J. Eq. 344 (Wyckoff v. Wyckoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyckoff v. Wyckoff, 49 N.J. Eq. 344 (N.J. 1892).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-chancellor.

For affirmance — Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Reed, Scudder, Bogert, Clement, Smith, Whitaker — 9.

For reversal — The Chief-Justice, Magie, Van Syckel, Brown — 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arenofsky v. Arenofsky
102 A.2d 101 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
D'Arcangelo v. D'Arcangelo
43 A.2d 169 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 N.J. Eq. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyckoff-v-wyckoff-nj-1892.