Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff

932 So. 2d 1150, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 2006 WL 1667394

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 16, 2006

DocketNo. 2D05-1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 932 So. 2d 1150 (Wyckoff v. Wyckoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyckoff v. Wyckoff, 932 So. 2d 1150, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 2006 WL 1667394 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Douglas M. Wyckoff appeals the trial court’s order rendered March 11, 2005, arguing that the court erred in resolving several postdissolution issues. He also argues that in light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928 (Fla.2005), this court should [1151]*1151vacate or modify our earlier decision in Wyckoff v. Wyckoff 820 So.2d 350 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We affirm in all respects but note that the substantial change test approved in Wade would apply to further child custody modification proceedings between the parties.

Affirmed.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Douglas M. Wyckoff appeals the trial court’s order rendered March 11, 2005, arguing that the court erred in resolving several postdissolution issues. He also argues that in light of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So.2d 928 (Fla.2005), this court should [1151]*1151vacate or modify our earlier decision in Wyckoff v. Wyckoff 820 So.2d 350 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). We affirm in all respects but note that the substantial change test approved in Wade would apply to further child custody modification proceedings between the parties.

Affirmed.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

932 So. 2d 1150, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 10012, 2006 WL 1667394, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyckoff-v-wyckoff-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack