Wyatt v. Wyatt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wyatt v. Wyatt

79 S.E. 372, 13 Ga. App. 468, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 209

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 23, 1913

Docket4756

StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 372 (Wyatt v. Wyatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyatt v. Wyatt, 79 S.E. 372, 13 Ga. App. 468, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 209 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Russell, J.

An action of trover was brought and bail process issued. The defendant gave bail bond with surety. On the trial, upon motion of the defendant’s counsel, the bail process was dismissed and the surety on the bond discharged. Thereafter the case proceeded to verdict and judgment against the defendant in trover only. The plaintiff sued out a writ of error, assigning error upon the judgment discharging the surety, but the surety was not served with the bill of exceptions. Held, that the writ of error must be dismissed. The surety was not a party in the court below, but he has a property right in the judgment in his favor. He is a party to the writ of error, and, as his fights are to be affected by the judgment in the Court of Appeals, he is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard in this court. Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Russell, J.

An action of trover was brought and bail process issued. The defendant gave bail bond with surety. On the trial, upon motion of the defendant’s counsel, the bail process was dismissed and the surety on the bond discharged. Thereafter the case proceeded to verdict and judgment against the defendant in trover only. The plaintiff sued out a writ of error, assigning error upon the judgment discharging the surety, but the surety was not served with the bill of exceptions. Held, that the writ of error must be dismissed. The surety was not a party in the court below, but he has a property right in the judgment in his favor. He is a party to the writ of error, and, as his fights are to be affected by the judgment in the Court of Appeals, he is entitled to notice and an opportunity to be heard in this court. Writ of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 S.E. 372, 13 Ga. App. 468, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-wyatt-gactapp-1913.