Wyatt v. Ward

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Wyatt v. Ward

1902 OK 48, 69 P. 1133, 12 Okla. 9, 1902 Okla. LEXIS 49

DecidedJuly 17, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 1902 OK 48 (Wyatt v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wyatt v. Ward, 1902 OK 48, 69 P. 1133, 12 Okla. 9, 1902 Okla. LEXIS 49 (Okla. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam::

This is an action for mandatory injunction. The facts in the case are the same as those in the case of Anderson v. Ferguson, decided at this sitting of this court, and for the reasons given in that case this will be reversed, .and a new trial granted, and the lower court is directed to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the case of Anderson v. Ferguson, supra. Costs taxed to the appellee, It is further ordered that the parties be placed in the same occupancy of the land that they were in at the time of the commencement of this action, and to so remain until the further order of the district court or the judge thereof; but this order is not intended to preclude the parties or either of them from pursuing any other remedy which either may have in any of the courts of the territory.’

Hamer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Irwin, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam::

This is an action for mandatory injunction. The facts in the case are the same as those in the case of Anderson v. Ferguson, decided at this sitting of this court, and for the reasons given in that case this will be reversed, .and a new trial granted, and the lower court is directed to proceed in conformity with the views expressed in the case of Anderson v. Ferguson, supra. Costs taxed to the appellee, It is further ordered that the parties be placed in the same occupancy of the land that they were in at the time of the commencement of this action, and to so remain until the further order of the district court or the judge thereof; but this order is not intended to preclude the parties or either of them from pursuing any other remedy which either may have in any of the courts of the territory.’

Hamer, J., who presided in the court below, not sitting; Irwin, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1902 OK 48, 69 P. 1133, 12 Okla. 9, 1902 Okla. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-ward-okla-1902.