Wyatt v. Wanamaker

126 A.D. 656, 111 N.Y.S. 90, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3422
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

There is presented upon this appeal the same question as was presented in the case of Wyatt v. McCreery & Co. (126 App. Div. 650), decided herewith. The plaintiff is an infant, and on the facts pleaded she is not estopped from invoking the protection awarded to her by the act in question.

The judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs, Avith leave to defendants to amend the answer within twenty days upon payment of costs in this court and in the court below.

Present •— Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ.

* Judgment affirmed, with costs, Avith leave to defendants to amend on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wyatt v. Wanamaker, 126 A.D. 656, 111 N.Y.S. 90, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

126 A.D. 656 (Wyatt v. Wanamaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alexandre v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc.
169 Misc. 398 (Mount Vernon City Court, 1938)
Sidney v. A. S. Beck Shoe Corp.
153 Misc. 166 (New York Supreme Court, 1934)