Wyatt v. State

227 A.D.2d 283, 642 N.Y.S.2d 312
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 21, 1996
DocketClaim No. 72834; Claim No. 73472
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 283 (Wyatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wyatt v. State, 227 A.D.2d 283, 642 N.Y.S.2d 312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

—Judgment, Court of Claims (Albert Blinder, J.), entered on or about February 3, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, [284]*284awarded claimant James Wyatt the principal sum of $4,059,500, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Judgment, same court and Judge, entered on or about February 3, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, awarded claimant Gerard Plunkett the principal sum of $1,360,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The awards do not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation for these serious injuries (CPLR 5501 [c]). Claimant Wyatt received a gunshot wound to the abdomen that caused multiple perforations of the small bowel. A bowel resection was performed during which 15 and 20 centimeter segments of bowel were removed. Subsequent operations were performed, including a procedure to remove a growth in Wyatt’s nasal cavity that left him with lost sensation in his face and a permanent indentation in his cheek, a femoral neurolysis to repair nerve damage that left him with a severe limp and a procedure to repair an incisional hernia. Claimant Plunkett was struck by a bullet that fragmented upon entering his hip, causing a loss of pulse in the groin area and a fracture of the neck of the left femur. He underwent three surgical procedures to remove the bullet fragments, to graft a portion of the bone and to insert a plate, wires and screws in the hip. His physical activities are greatly curtailed, and in all likelihood he will have to undergo a hip replacement in 10 or 15 years. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin, Kupferman and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kirby v. Turner Construction Co.
286 A.D.2d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Overeem v. Neuhoff
254 A.D.2d 398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D.2d 283, 642 N.Y.S.2d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wyatt-v-state-nyappdiv-1996.